(All amounts expressed in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted)
Stock Symbol: AEM (NYSE and TSX)
of
This result includes a non-cash foreign currency translation gain of
million
sale securities and mark-to-market loss on warrants of
(
(
Excluding these items would result in an adjusted net loss of
million
Company reported net income of
The financial results in the current quarter were negatively impacted by
the much lower production from the Kittila mine due to a previously
announced extended maintenance shutdown during the quarter.
Consequently, the costs incurred by Kittila exceeded revenues during
this period. The Company’s quarterly performance was also impacted by
negative settlement adjustments for byproduct metals at LaRonde and
second quarter than in the preceding quarter. Outside of the shutdown
at Kittila, the Company’s operating performance was in line with its
expectations.
For the first six months of 2013, the Company reported a net loss of
months of 2012 when net income was
Financial results in the 2013 period were negatively impacted by lower
commodity prices and the Kittila shutdown in the second quarter, as
discussed above.
Second quarter 2013 cash provided by operating activities was
million
capital), compared to cash provided by operating activities of
of 2012 (
working capital).
For the first six months of 2013, cash provided by operating activities
was
components of working capital), as compared with the first half of 2012
when cash provided by operating activities was
million
The lower net income and cash provided by operating activities in 2013
was primarily due to lower realized metal prices and an extended
maintenance shutdown at Kittila, as described above.
“Production for the second quarter was in line with our expectations,
and we anticipate meeting our 2013 guidance with stronger second half
production expected at LaRonde, Kittila and Meadowbank, and the planned
start of production at Goldex,” said
Executive Officer. “Given the current low gold price environment, we
are in the process of reviewing all aspects of our business. Today we
are announcing capital and other costs reductions of approximately
million
capital expenditures at existing mines and projects will be in excess
of
million
growth profile in 2014 and 2015 remains intact,” added Mr. Boyd.
Operating highlights include:
-
Second quarter 2013 production and costs in line with expectations – Production is expected to be stronger in the second half of the year
with lower cash costs, and improved cash flow. Production and cost
performance for the first half of the year has been in line with
Company expectations, given the previously announced maintenance
shutdown at Kittila and mine sequencing during the year. 2013
production guidance remains at between 970,000 and 1,010,000 ounces of
gold at total cash cost per ounce of$735 to $785 . -
Kittila autoclave restarted after completion of extended maintenance
program – Throughput and recoveries already at normal steady state levels.
Autoclave modifications are expected to improve availability over time. -
All aspects of business under review in the context of the current gold
price environment – Focus on reducing exploration spending, mine optimization aimed at
reducing operating and capital costs, and evaluation of metal price
assumptions used to calculate reserves and resources. -
On track to meet production guidance of approximately 1.2 million ounces
of gold by 2015 -
Capital and cost reductions of approximately
$50 million in 2013 and
$250 million in 2014 -
La
India commissioning on track for year-end 2013 – Project remains on schedule and on budget
Payable gold production1 in the second quarter of 2013 was 224,089 ounces, including 5,389
ounces from Kittila, compared to 265,350 ounces in the second quarter
of 2012. The lower level of production in the 2013 period was
primarily due to the extended maintenance shutdown at Kittila. A
description of the production and cost performance for each mine is set
out below.
Given that the Kittila autoclave operated for only 14 days in the second
quarter, the impact of its expenditures is excluded from total cash
costs per ounce calculations. On that basis, total cash costs per
ounce for the second quarter of 2013 were
compares with
cash cost per ounce in 2013 was largely attributable to lower byproduct
revenue at LaRonde and
Payable gold production for the first half of 2013 was 461,064 ounces,
including 48,534 ounces from Kittila, compared to payable gold
production of 520,305 ounces in the comparable 2012 period, of which
almost 82,000 ounces were from Kittila.
For the first half of 2013, total cash costs were
excluding the second quarter impact of Kittila. This compares with
operations). The lower production and higher costs in 2013 are due to
the factors that impacted the second quarter, as mentioned above.
Production is expected to be stronger in the second half of 2013 due to
resumption of production at Kittila, increased production at
levels of LaRonde, higher expected grades at Meadowbank, and the
planned start of production at Goldex.
Agnico Eagle’s production guidance for 2013 remains unchanged at 970,000
to 1,010,000 ounces of gold. Expected total cash costs per ounce are
also unchanged at
all-in sustaining costs2 remain approximately
In 2014, Agnico Eagle expects to have significant production growth from
LaRonde (due to anticipated improvement in grades), Goldex (due to a
planned full year of operations) and La India (due to the expected
start of commercial production in 2014). The Company expects payable
gold production to be in the range of 1,100,000 ounces to 1,140,000
ounces as previously announced in the Company’s
release.
In 2015, further production growth is expected from LaRonde (due to
higher grades) and
with payable gold production expected to exceed 1,200,000 ounces, also
as forecasted in the
Review of Business Activities – Adjusting to a Lower Gold Price
Environment
Given the recent decline in the gold price, the Company has initiated on
a business review in order to optimize the asset base and enhance
shareholder value. The Company is taking a measured approach to this
process with both immediate and longer term cost reductions under
consideration.
Optimization of Mine Plans
All mine plans are being reviewed with the goal of reducing capital and
operating costs on an ongoing basis. For 2013, capital spending is now
expected to be
announced in the
program is not expected to have an impact on the gold production
guidance for the 2013 to 2015 period.
Strategic Review of Exploration Activities
All regional exploration programs, minesite and joint venture activities
are currently undergoing a process of prioritization. As a result, the
2013 exploration budget of
approximately 22% to
expected to be approximately
million
reduction from historical levels of approximately
Review of Metal Price Assumptions Used to Develop Mine Plans
The Company plans to review the metal price assumptions used to
calculate its cutoff grades and its mine plans. At lower gold prices,
the cutoff grade typically rises. With higher grades expected to be
delivered for processing, the intention is to generate higher profit
margins.
Proven and probable reserves at shorter life assets were calculated
using a gold price of
were calculated using a gold price of
details see the
the above gold prices (leaving all other assumptions unchanged), the
Company estimates there would be a 4% change in proven and probable
gold reserves.
The Company has analysed its operating mines and development projects
for impairment as of
were required. In the circumstances where the spot price of gold
remains persistently low and the expectations of future realizable gold
prices are lowered from current expectations, there is a possibility of
future impairment charges to the Company’s mining assets.
Dividend Maintained
Agnico Eagle has paid a dividend for 31 consecutive years.
Directors
share to be paid on
Other Expected Dividend and Record Dates for 2013
| Record Date | Payment Date |
| Dec. 2 | Dec. 16 |
Board of Directors
Agnico Eagle wishes to extend its deepest sympathy to the family of Mr.
the Board of Directors since 1997. “Doug was an active and trusted
member of our Board of Directors and served as a great resource to our
technical group on many projects. Doug’s experience, knowledge and
above all, his friendship, will be missed by all of us,” said
Nasso
The Company’s senior management will host a conference call on
July 25, 2013
provide an update of the Company’s operating activities.
Via Webcast:
A live audio webcast of the meeting will be available on the Company’s
website homepage at www.agnicoeagle.com.
Via Telephone:
For those preferring to listen by telephone, please dial 416-644-3414 or
Toll-free 1-800-814-4859. To ensure your participation, please call
approximately five minutes prior to the scheduled start of the call.
Replay archive:
Please dial 416-640-1917 or Toll-free 1-877-289-8525, access code
4568955#.
The conference call replay will expire on
The webcast along with presentation slides will be archived for 180 days on the website.
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures in the second quarter of 2013 were
including
million
and
development projects included
at Goldex, and
Capital expenditures for the first six months of 2013 were
million
approximately
the previously announced figures. The majority of the Company’s 2013
growth-related capital expenditure relates to the Goldex and La India
mines, which are expected to be in full production next year.
The Company is in the process of reviewing future capital requirements,
previously estimated at approximately
next five or six years. The current estimate for 2014 is expected to
be approximately
figure, or approximately
year during the regular budget process.
Approximately
Meliadine, however the project will continue to advance with
approximately
exploration drilling. The project is currently the subject of an
updated technical study with results expected mid-2014. The timing of
capital expenditures on the project beyond 2014 will be subject to
Board approval and prevailing market conditions.
Liquidity – Balance Sheet Flexibility Maintained
Cash and cash equivalents totaled
from the
cash balance is largely due to the impact of lower production and lower
metal prices on operating cash flows, which were lower than the level
of capital expenditures. The outstanding balance on the Company’s
credit facility was
lines as of
gold prices and related forecasts, the Company remains well within its
debt covenants. The Company’s debt is comprised of five separate
series of notes, whose maturities are spread out over a seven-year
period, with the earliest maturity being
LaRonde – Cooling Plant Infrastructure Development Progressing Well
The 100% owned LaRonde mine in northwestern
operation in 1988. Current mine life is estimated to be through 2026.
The LaRonde mill processed an average of 6,143 tonnes per day (“tpd”) in
the second quarter of 2013, compared to an average of 6,294 tpd in the
corresponding period of 2012. The lower mill throughput in the current
period was largely due to five days of scheduled mill maintenance being
advanced from the third quarter of 2013 into the second quarter.
Work on the ventilation and cooling plant infrastructure continues on
schedule with installation still expected to be completed in the fourth
quarter of 2013, which should provide additional mining flexibility. In
the second quarter of 2013, approximately 60% of the ore milled came
from the deeper portion of the LaRonde mine. The proportion of
production from the deeper mine ore is expected to increase over the
course of the year as two higher grade deep pyramids are mined. The
mined grade is expected to continue to increase towards the average
reserve grade over the next several years.
Minesite costs per tonne3 were approximately
are higher than the
2012. The increase in costs is largely due to lower throughput,
additional development work and general inflation during the quarter.
For the first six months of 2013, the LaRonde mill processed an average
of 6,372 tpd, compared to 6,690 tpd in the first six months of 2012.
Minesite costs per tonne were approximately
tonne in the first six months of 2012. Costs were higher due to the
reasons described above.
On a per ounce basis, net of byproduct credits, LaRonde’s total cash
costs per ounce were
of 46,119 ounces of gold. This compares with the second quarter of
2012 when total cash costs per ounce were
ounces of gold.
The increase in total cash costs per ounce was mainly due to lower
byproduct metal prices and production volumes (approximate impact of
negative settlement adjustments on byproducts (impact of
and higher minesite costs per tonne (as previously mentioned). Silver
and zinc production in the second quarter of 2013 was 20% and 64%
lower, respectively, compared to the second quarter of 2012. Realized
silver and zinc prices in the second quarter of 2013 were 29% and 8%
lower, respectively, compared to the second quarter of 2012.
In the first six months of 2013, LaRonde produced 85,192 ounces of gold
at total cash costs per ounce of
first half of 2012 when the mine produced 83,487 ounces of gold at
total cash costs of
significantly lower byproduct prices, as described above.
Production and costs are expected to improve in the second half of 2013
due to increased tonnage and higher grades from the lower mine and
better budgeted recoveries from the installation of the new Carbon In
Pulp circuit in the second quarter of 2013.
After 2013, LaRonde is expected to ramp up production over the next
several years to an average life of mine production of more than
300,000 ounces of gold per year, reflecting the higher gold grades
expected at depth. As a result of the higher grades, the value of the
ore expected to be processed over LaRonde’s remaining 14-year life is
approximately 50% higher than the value of the ore mined in 2012
(assuming the same metals prices).
Lapa – Zulapa Drilling Could Have a Positive Impact on Production and
Grades
The 100% owned Lapa mine in northwestern
production in
2016.
The Lapa circuit at the LaRonde mill processed an average of 1,745 tpd
in the second quarter of 2013, essentially unchanged from 1,741 tpd in
the second quarter of 2012.
Minesite costs per tonne were
compared to
cost in the current period is due to lower cement consumption (due to a
higher ratio of unconsolidated backfill), productivity improvements,
and cost reductions versus the comparable period last year.
For the first six months of 2013, the Lapa mill processed an average of
1,761 tpd, compared to 1,740 tpd in the first six months of 2012.
Minesite costs per tonne were approximately
explained above.
Payable production in the second quarter of 2013 was 23,178 ounces of
gold at total cash costs per ounce of
second quarter of 2012, when production was 28,157 ounces of gold at
total cash cost per ounce of
in gold production and higher total cash costs per ounce were generally
due to the processing of lower gold grades compared to the same quarter
last year.
In the first six months of 2013, Lapa produced 50,046 ounces of gold at
total cash costs per ounce of
2012 when the mine produced 56,656 ounces of gold at total cash costs
of
Recent exploration drilling in the Zulapa area (a parallel zone
approximately 150 metres from the Lapa deposits) from an exploration
drift at a depth of about 1,000 metres has yielded some of the best
results ever seen at the Lapa mine. Highlights include values up to
19.3 g/t gold over 6.5 metres, and 28.9 g/t gold over 2.8 metres.
Additional information on these drill intersections is included in the
tables below.
| Highlights from 2013 Zulapa Exploration Drilling | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Drill hole ID |
From (metres) |
To (metres) |
Estimated true width (metres) |
Gold grade (g/t) uncapped |
Gold grade (capped at 50 g/t) |
|||||||||||||||
| LA12-125-42 | 379.9 | 384.3 | 2.8 | 210.6 | 20.3 | |||||||||||||||
| D13-128-43D | 192.0 | 196.3 | 4.0 | 7.8 | 7.8 | |||||||||||||||
| LA13-101-107 | 321.7 | 329.2 | 6.5 | 39.3 | 19.3 | |||||||||||||||
| LA13-110-1 | 208.2 | 211.2 | 2.8 | 31.2 | 28.9 | |||||||||||||||
| Drill collar coordinates | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Drill hole ID | UTM North | UTM East |
Elevation (metres below sea level) |
Azimuth |
Dip (degrees) |
Length (metres) |
||||||||||||||||||
| LA12-125-42 | 5345184.2 | 701889.2 | 855 | 147.0 | -59 | 446.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
| D13-128-43D | 5345148.3 | 701885.9 | 907 | 150.7 | -26 | 225.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
| LA13-101-107 | 5344707.1 | 702123.1 | 634 | 11.9 | -28.1 | 524.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
| LA13-110-1 | 5345131.3 | 702325.7 | 710 | 167.8 | -34.7 | 250.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
| * Coordinate System UTM NAD83-Z17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Although it is too early to determine the full impact of these results,
these zones are close to existing workings and the grades compare
favorably to the current reserve grade of 5.95 g/t gold. Additional
drilling is planned for these sectors in 2013.
Maintenance
The 100% owned Kittila mine in northern
production in
2037.
As a result of only operating for 14 days in the second quarter of 2013,
the mill processed an average of approximately 568 tpd. In the second
quarter of 2012, the Kittila mill processed 2,758 tpd. The shutdown to
re-brick the entire autoclave started on
operations resumed at the end of June. In addition to re-bricking,
further modifications were made to the autoclave, which are expected to
result in more robust operating performance over time. Following the
re-start of the autoclave, throughput and recoveries are back to levels
seen prior to the scheduled shutdown.
For the first six months of 2013, the Kittila mill processed an average
of 1,761 tpd, compared to 2,969 tpd in the first six months of 2012.
The lower throughput in 2013 is due to the maintenance shutdown in the
second quarter.
Second quarter 2013 gold production at Kittila was 5,389 ounces. In the
second quarter of 2012 the mine produced 35,228 ounces. Lower
production in the 2013 period was largely due to the extended mill
shutdown compared to the second quarter of 2012. Operating costs
during normal operating days at Kittila in the second quarter of 2013
were similar to those incurred in the preceding quarter, which was
considered its normal steady state.
In the first six months of 2013, Kittila produced 48,534 ounces of
gold. This is in contrast to the first half of 2012, when the mine
produced 81,986 ounces of gold.
In
expansion at Kittila, which is expected to increase the capacity at the
mine to 3,750 tpd starting in the second half of 2015. To date, the
engineering, procurement, and construction management contract has been
awarded, detailed engineering has commenced and the procurement of long
lead items is underway. The expansion is expected to reduce total cash
costs per ounce and to offset the production impact of a gradual
reduction in realized grade towards the reserve grade over the next
several years.
The 100% owned
production in
through 2029.
The
quarter of 2013, essentially in line with 5,036 tpd per day processed
in the second quarter of 2012. During the second quarter of 2013,
approximately 209,000 tonnes of ore were stacked on the heap leach at
The smaller proportion of the lower cost heap leach tonnes in the
current period resulted in a higher minesite cost per tonne of
the second quarter of 2013, compared to
quarter of 2012. In spite of the increase in per tonne costs,
production costs at
comparable period in 2012.
For the first six months of 2013 the
average of 5,136 tpd, slightly higher than 5,002 tpd processed in the
first half of 2012. Minesite costs per tonne were approximately
above the
proportion of heap leach tonnes in the current period.
Payable production in the second quarter of 2013 was 47,383 ounces of
gold at a total cash cost per ounce of
production of 45,307 ounces at a total cash cost of
quarter of 2012. The increase in year over year cash cost per ounce is
due to a 29% decline in realized silver price compared to the prior
year period as well as stockpile movements and a stronger Mexican peso.
The decline in realized silver price is estimated to account for
approximately
In the first six months of 2013,
gold at total cash costs per ounce of
first half of 2012 when the mine produced 88,599 ounces of gold at
total cash costs of
costs per ounce is due to the same reasons discussed above, while
production costs over the same period are essentially unchanged.
The
with approximately 50% of the total budget committed to date. Activity
in the second quarter included preparation of the headframe foundation,
construction of the hoist building and
will allow better matching of the mill capacity with the future mining
capacity at
wind down as planned in the next several years.
Creston Mascota – Restart Progressing Well
The Creston Mascota heap leach has been operating as a satellite
operation to the
Approximately 386,000 tonnes of ore were stacked on the Creston Mascota
leach pad during the second quarter of 2013, compared to approximately
476,000 tonnes stacked in the second quarter of 2012. The decrease in
tonnes stacked was mainly a result of the previously announced
temporary suspension of activities at the Creston Mascota mine.
Leaching resumed on the Phase 2 pad at Creston Mascota in
The ramp up of production is in line with expectations. Minesite costs
per tonne at Creston Mascota were
unchanged from the second quarter of 2012.
For the first six months of 2013, mine site costs per tonne at
2012. Production at Creston Mascota is expected to increase in the
second half of 2013.
Payable gold production at Creston Mascota in the second quarter of 2013
was 10,147 ounces at a total cash cost per ounce of
to 18,049 ounces at a total cash cost per ounce of
second quarter of 2012. The decline in production and higher costs per
ounce are reflective of the ramp up schedule of the Creston Mascota
operation as described above. Payable gold production for the first
six months of 2013 totaled 12,054 ounces, compared to 31,773 ounces in
the first six months of 2012. Production at Creston Mascota is
expected to increase during the remainder of 2013.
Meadowbank – Production Expected to Increase Further in Second Half of
2013
The 100% owned Meadowbank mine is located in
mine life is estimated to be through 2018.
The Meadowbank mill processed an average of 11,303 tpd in the second
quarter of 2013. This compares with 9,901 tpd in the second quarter of
2012. The higher throughput, period over period, is largely due to the
continued strong operating performance of the permanent secondary
crushing unit that was commissioned in
crusher has consistently exceeded the initial design rate of 8,500 tpd
since startup.
Minesite costs per tonne were
compared with
lower in the 2013 period due to more tonnes of ore processed in 2013
versus 2012, improved productivity, as well as multiple cost reduction
initiatives.
For the first six months of 2013, the Meadowbank mill processed an
average of 11,311 tpd, compared to 9,825 tpd in the first six months of
2012. Minesite costs per tonne were approximately
six months of 2013, below the
period due to reasons described above.
Payable production in the second quarter of 2013 was 91,873 ounces of
gold at total cash costs per ounce of
production in the second quarter of 2012 of 98,403 ounces of gold at
total cash costs per ounce of
production and change in total cash costs reflects a 17% decline in
realized grade compared to the second quarter of 2012 due to mine
sequencing. The grade profile is expected to improve during the
remainder of 2013, which should result in higher production at lower
costs.
In the first six months of 2013, Meadowbank produced 173,691 ounces of
gold at total cash costs per ounce of
the mine produced 177,804 ounces of gold at total cash costs of
per ounce. Despite higher total cash costs per ounce that were
associated with a lower budgeted gold grade in the first half of 2013,
Meadowbank’s minesite costs per tonne were 7% lower than in the 2012
period due to the higher throughput and cost saving initiatives
outlined above.
The 100% owned Goldex mine in northwestern
2008 but mining in the original GEZ orebody was suspended in
2011
zones were approved for construction, while the mining operations at
GEZ remain suspended.
The Goldex mine is expected to commence operations in the M and E zones,
with an anticipated commercial production of approximately 15,000
ounces of gold in the fourth quarter of 2013. Development activities
at the mine have proceeded well to date with construction of the paste
plant and ore pass systems being on schedule.
The Company expects to be able to evaluate technical studies on several
other satellite zones at the mine by the end of 2013.
La
2013
The La India project in
La India remains on schedule and budget for commissioning in the fourth
quarter of 2013, with commercial production anticipated in the first
quarter 2014.
During the quarter, work advanced on the installation of the plant,
crushing system and leach pads. In addition, power generators were
installed and are now operational. Metallurgical testing continues on
the La India sulphides and Tarachi ores, with results expected later
this year.
The Company is planning to conduct site visits for analysts and
investors to the La India project in the third week of September to
coincide with the
Meliadine – 2013 and 2014 Expenditures Reduced by
million
Located near
acquired in
projects in terms of resources.
At the end of the second quarter, approximately 70,000 metres of
drilling had been completed, with an additional 10,000 metres
anticipated to be completed by the end of July. Most of the drilling
was carried out to infill and expand the reserve and resource base.
Encouraging results have been returned from the Tiriganiaq, Wesmeg,
Normeg, Pump South, and F zones. These results will be incorporated
into an updated technical study that is expected to be completed in the
second quarter of 2014.
Construction is continuing on the permanent all-season road linking the
project with the community of
road was connected to the Meliadine camp in March and is functional,
with full completion expected this August.
The original budget for the Meliadine project in 2013 was approximately
program has been prioritized and as a result, the budget has been
reduced by approximately
In 2014, the proposed capital budget for Meliadine is now expected to be
approximately
previous estimates. Permitting activities are on-going and work in
2014 will primarily focus on continued exploration ramp development and
exploration drilling. The timing of capital expenditures on the project
beyond 2014 will be subject to Board approval and prevailing market
conditions.
Dividend Reinvestment Program
Please follow the link below for information on the Company’s dividend
reinvestment program.
About Agnico Eagle
Agnico Eagle is a long established, Canadian headquartered, gold
producer with operations located in
exploration and/or development activities in
and
prices consistent with its policy of no forward gold sales and
maintains a corporate strategy based on increasing shareholder exposure
to gold, on a per share basis. It has declared a cash dividend for 31
consecutive years.
|
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LIMITED SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (thousands of United States dollars, except where noted) (Unaudited) |
|||||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
| Operating margin by mine(i) | |||||||||||||||
| LaRonde mine | $14,372 | $29,342 | $47,667 | $92,608 | |||||||||||
| Lapa mine | 16,643 | 26,222 | 38,431 | 53,899 | |||||||||||
| Kittila mine | (112) | 31,489 | 44,844 | 80,538 | |||||||||||
| Pinos Altos mine(ii) | 47,188 | 79,887 | 101,015 | 149,022 | |||||||||||
| Meadowbank mine | 32,382 | 72,715 | 68,885 | 121,487 | |||||||||||
| Total operating margin | 110,473 | 239,655 | 300,842 | 497,554 | |||||||||||
| Amortization of property, plant and mine development | 70,128 | 66,310 | 140,199 | 130,863 | |||||||||||
| Exploration, corporate and other | 63,805 | 96,169 | 135,495 | 182,005 | |||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income and mining taxes | (23,460) | 77,176 | 25,148 | 184,686 | |||||||||||
| Income and mining taxes | 920 | 33,904 | 25,669 | 62,866 | |||||||||||
| Net income (loss) for the period | ($24,380) | $43,272 | ($521) | $121,820 | |||||||||||
| Net income (loss) per share — basic (US$) | ($0.14) | $0.25 | $0.00 | $0.71 | |||||||||||
| Cash provided by operating activities | $75,298 | $194,082 | $221,370 | $390,579 | |||||||||||
| Realized prices (US$) | |||||||||||||||
| Gold (per ounce) | $1,336 | $1,602 | $1,474 | $1,642 | |||||||||||
| Silver (per ounce) | $18.72 | $26.33 | $23.77 | $30.75 | |||||||||||
| Zinc (per tonne) | $1,753 | $1,901 | $1,895 | $2,026 | |||||||||||
| Copper (per tonne) | $6,551 | $6,455 | $7,012 | $7,842 | |||||||||||
| Payable production(iii) | |||||||||||||||
| Gold (ounces) | |||||||||||||||
| LaRonde mine | 46,119 | 40,206 | 85,192 | 83,487 | |||||||||||
| Lapa mine | 23,178 | 28,157 | 50,046 | 56,656 | |||||||||||
| Kittila mine | 5,389 | 35,228 | 48,534 | 81,986 | |||||||||||
| Pinos Altos mine(ii) | 57,530 | 63,356 | 103,601 | 120,372 | |||||||||||
| Meadowbank mine | 91,873 | 98,403 | 173,691 | 177,804 | |||||||||||
| Total gold (ounces) | 224,089 | 265,350 | 461,064 | 520,305 | |||||||||||
| Silver (thousands of ounces) | |||||||||||||||
| LaRonde mine | 424 | 532 | 1,035 | 1,222 | |||||||||||
| Kittila mine | – | – | 2 | – | |||||||||||
| Pinos Altos mine(ii) | 619 | 537 | 1,235 | 1,044 | |||||||||||
| Meadowbank mine | 23 | 26 | 45 | 44 | |||||||||||
| Total silver (thousands of ounces) | 1,066 | 1,095 | 2,317 | 2,310 | |||||||||||
| Zinc (tonnes) | 3,455 | 9,558 | 11,694 | 22,536 | |||||||||||
| Copper (tonnes) | 1,280 | 1,004 | 2,362 | 2,330 | |||||||||||
| Payable metal sold | |||||||||||||||
| Gold (ounces) | |||||||||||||||
| LaRonde mine | 46,953 | 39,886 | 86,541 | 83,631 | |||||||||||
| Lapa mine | 25,644 | 27,793 | 49,583 | 55,690 | |||||||||||
| Kittila mine | 12,752 | 34,476 | 57,092 | 78,703 | |||||||||||
| Pinos Altos mine(ii) | 56,882 | 66,373 | 101,992 | 118,518 | |||||||||||
| Meadowbank mine | 87,798 | 93,299 | 167,810 | 167,913 | |||||||||||
| Total gold (ounces) | 230,029 | 261,827 | 463,018 | 504,455 | |||||||||||
| Silver (thousands of ounces) | |||||||||||||||
| LaRonde mine | 487 | 482 | 1,070 | 1,200 | |||||||||||
| Kittila mine | 2 | – | 3 | – | |||||||||||
| Pinos Altos mine(ii) | 654 | 525 | 1,240 | 1018 | |||||||||||
| Meadowbank mine | 23 | 24 | 45 | 42 | |||||||||||
| Total silver (thousands of ounces) | 1,166 | 1,031 | 2,358 | 2,260 | |||||||||||
| Zinc (tonnes) | 5,280 | 10,379 | 12,279 | 23,411 | |||||||||||
| Copper (tonnes) | 1,291 | 1,085 | 2,358 | 2,378 | |||||||||||
| Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced (US$)(iv) | |||||||||||||||
| LaRonde mine | $927 | $784 | $831 | $489 | |||||||||||
| Lapa mine | 720 | 634 | 699 | 650 | |||||||||||
| Kittila mine(v) | – | 681 | 624 | 615 | |||||||||||
| Pinos Altos mine(ii) | 496 | 358 | 411 | 320 | |||||||||||
| Meadowbank mine | 912 | 804 | 986 | 901 | |||||||||||
| Weighted average total cash costs per ounce of gold produced | $785 | $660 | $762 | $628 | |||||||||||
| (i) |
Operating margin is calculated as revenues from mining operations less production costs. |
||||||||||||
| (ii) |
Includes the Creston Mascota deposit at Pinos Altos, except for total cash costs per ounce of gold produced in the first quarter of 2013 due to the temporary suspension of active leaching at the Creston Mascota deposit a Pinos Altos between October 1, 2012 and March 13, 2013. |
||||||||||||
| (iii) |
Payable production is the quantity of mineral produced during a period contained in products that are or will be sold by the Company, whether such products are sold during the period or held as inventory at the end of the period. |
||||||||||||
| (iv) |
Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced is calculated net of silver, copper, zinc and other byproduct revenue credits. The weighted average total cash costs per ounce of gold produced is based on commercial production ounces. Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced is a non-GAAP measure that the Company uses to monitor the performance of its operations. See “Reconciliation of Production Costs to Total Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold Produced by Mine” and “Reconciliation of Production Costs to Minesite Costs per Tonne by Mine” contained herein for details. |
||||||||||||
| (v) |
Excludes the Kittila mine’s results for the second quarter of 2013. Due to scheduled maintenance, the Kittila mine only operated for 16 days during the second quarter of 2013. |
||||||||||||
|
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LIMITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (thousands of United States dollars, US GAAP basis) (Unaudited) |
|||||||||||
|
As at June 30, 2013 |
As at December 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
| ASSETS | |||||||||||
| Current | |||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 136,363 | $ | 332,008 | |||||||
| Trade receivables | 60,001 | 67,750 | |||||||||
| Inventories: | |||||||||||
| Ore stockpiles | 69,012 | 52,342 | |||||||||
| Concentrates and dore bars | 59,646 | 69,695 | |||||||||
| Supplies | 192,870 | 222,630 | |||||||||
| Income taxes recoverable | 21,804 | 19,313 | |||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities | 68,805 | 44,719 | |||||||||
| Fair value of derivative financial instruments | 7,135 | 1,835 | |||||||||
| Other current assets | 115,242 | 92,977 | |||||||||
| Total current assets | 730,878 | 903,269 | |||||||||
| Other assets | 43,401 | 55,838 | |||||||||
| Goodwill | 235,414 | 229,279 | |||||||||
| Property, plant and mine development | 4,241,107 | 4,067,456 | |||||||||
| $ | 5,250,800 | $ | 5,255,842 | ||||||||
| LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||||||
| Current | |||||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 207,539 | $ | 185,329 | |||||||
| Reclamation provision | 11,022 | 16,816 | |||||||||
| Dividends payable | – | 37,905 | |||||||||
| Interest payable | 13,383 | 13,602 | |||||||||
| Income taxes payable | 4,445 | 10,061 | |||||||||
| Capital lease obligations | 10,959 | 12,955 | |||||||||
| Fair value of derivative financial instruments | 1,968 | – | |||||||||
| Total current liabilities | 249,316 | 276,668 | |||||||||
| Long-term debt | 850,000 | 830,000 | |||||||||
| Reclamation provision and other liabilities | 119,894 | 127,735 | |||||||||
| Deferred income and mining tax liabilities | 614,764 | 611,227 | |||||||||
| SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||||||
| Common shares | |||||||||||
| Authorized – unlimited | |||||||||||
| Issued – 173,311,379 (December 31, 2012 – 172,296,610) | 3,265,068 | 3,241,922 | |||||||||
| Stock options | 163,835 | 148,032 | |||||||||
| Warrants | 24,858 | 24,858 | |||||||||
| Contributed surplus | 15,665 | 15,665 | |||||||||
| Retained earnings (deficit) | (31,468) | 7,046 | |||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (21,132) | (27,311) | |||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 3,416,826 | 3,410,212 | |||||||||
| $ | 5,250,800 | $ | 5,255,842 | ||||||||
|
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LIMITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS) (thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts, US GAAP basis) (Unaudited) |
|||||||||||||||||
| Three months ended | Six months ended | ||||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
| REVENUES | |||||||||||||||||
| Revenues from mining operations | $ | 336,424 | $ | 459,561 | $ | 756,846 | $ | 932,495 | |||||||||
| COSTS AND EXPENSES | |||||||||||||||||
| Production (exclusive of amortization shown seperately below) | 225,951 | 219,906 | 456,004 | 434,941 | |||||||||||||
| Exploration and corporate development | 11,326 | 34,286 | 19,897 | 57,394 | |||||||||||||
| Amortization of property, plant and mine development | 70,128 | 66,310 | 140,199 | 130,863 | |||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 28,385 | 32,015 | 65,705 | 65,943 | |||||||||||||
| Impairment loss on available-for-sale securities | 17,313 | 11,581 | 28,308 | 11,581 | |||||||||||||
| Provincial capital tax | (1,504) | 4,001 | (1,504) | 4,001 | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense | 13,735 | 14,220 | 27,651 | 28,667 | |||||||||||||
| Interest and sundry expense and other | 5,670 | 4,344 | 2,900 | 3,180 | |||||||||||||
| Loss on sale of available-for-sale securities | – | 6,731 | – | 6,731 | |||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation (gain) loss | (11,120) | (11,009) | (7,462) | 4,508 | |||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income and mining taxes | (23,460) | 77,176 | 25,148 | 184,686 | |||||||||||||
| Income and mining taxes | 920 | 33,904 | 25,669 | 62,866 | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) for the period | $ | (24,380) | $ | 43,272 | $ | (521) | $ | 121,820 | |||||||||
| Net income (loss) per share – basic | ($0.14) | $0.25 | $0.00 | $0.71 | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) per share – diluted | ($0.14) | $0.25 | $0.00 | $0.71 | |||||||||||||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (in thousands): | |||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 172,572 | 170,985 | 172,426 | 170,937 | |||||||||||||
| Diluted | 172,572 | 171,279 | 172,426 | 171,148 | |||||||||||||
|
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LIMITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (thousands of United States dollars, US GAAP basis) (Unaudited) |
||||||||||||||||
| Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
| OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) for the period | $ | (24,380) | $ | 43,272 | $ | (521) | $ | 121,820 | ||||||||
| Add (deduct) items not affecting cash: | ||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of property, plant and mine development | 70,128 | 66,310 | 140,199 | 130,863 | ||||||||||||
| Deferred income and mining taxes | (562) | 15,069 | 6,464 | 25,389 | ||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | 9,332 | 11,296 | 25,609 | 27,068 | ||||||||||||
| Loss on sale of available-for-sale securities | – | 6,731 | – | 6,731 | ||||||||||||
| Impairment loss on available-for-sale securities | 17,313 | 11,581 | 28,308 | 11,581 | ||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation (gain) loss | (11,120) | (11,009) | (7,462) | 4,508 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 5,877 | 4,811 | 11,008 | 7,610 | ||||||||||||
| Adjustment for settlement of environmental remediation | (2,990) | (6,059) | (5,542) | (12,291) | ||||||||||||
| Changes in non-cash working capital balances: | ||||||||||||||||
| Trade receivables | 10,525 | 15,000 | 7,749 | 7 | ||||||||||||
| Income taxes | (4,199) | 24,013 | (8,107) | 43,882 | ||||||||||||
| Inventories | 3,789 | (9,295) | 31,781 | 2,254 | ||||||||||||
| Other current assets | (15,091) | (8,955) | (20,856) | 9,855 | ||||||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 24,283 | 41,209 | 14,181 | 11,357 | ||||||||||||
| Interest payable | (7,607) | (9,892) | (1,441) | (55) | ||||||||||||
| Cash provided by operating activities | 75,298 | 194,082 | 221,370 | 390,579 | ||||||||||||
| INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and mine development | (171,773) | (104,368) | (302,407) | (180,363) | ||||||||||||
| Acquisitions and investments | (49,635) | – | (62,310) | (11,325) | ||||||||||||
| Net proceeds from available-for-sale securities | – | 30,732 | – | 30,732 | ||||||||||||
| Cash used in investing activities | (221,408) | (73,636) | (364,717) | (160,956) | ||||||||||||
| FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid | (31,759) | (30,283) | (61,649) | (60,798) | ||||||||||||
| Repayment of capital lease obligations | (3,509) | (2,744) | (6,062) | (5,856) | ||||||||||||
| Proceeds from long-term debt | 50,000 | 255,000 | 90,000 | 255,000 | ||||||||||||
| Repayment of long-term debt | – | (255,000) | (70,000) | (345,000) | ||||||||||||
| Long-term debt financing costs | – | (327) | – | (327) | ||||||||||||
| Repurchase of common shares for restricted share unit plan | – | – | (19,000) | (12,031) | ||||||||||||
| Common shares issued | 3,945 | 4,096 | 15,884 | 7,676 | ||||||||||||
| Cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 18,677 | (29,258) | (50,827) | (161,336) | ||||||||||||
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (599) | (1,211) | (1,471) | (693) | ||||||||||||
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents during the period | (128,032) | 89,977 | (195,645) | 67,594 | ||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 264,395 | 199,075 | 332,008 | 221,458 | ||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 136,363 | $ | 289,052 | $ | 136,363 | $ | 289,052 | ||||||||
| SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest paid | $ | 21,715 | $ | 23,887 | $ | 28,547 | $ | 27,980 | ||||||||
| Income and mining taxes paid | $ | 9,367 | $ | 1,286 | $ | 31,000 | $ | 5,591 | ||||||||
RECONCILIATION OF PRODUCTION COSTS TO TOTAL CASH COSTS
PER OUNCE OF GOLD PRODUCED AND MINESITE COSTS PER TONNE (Unaudited)
| Total Production Costs by Mine | ||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||
| June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | |||||||||
| (thousands of United States dollars) | ||||||||||||
| Production costs per the interim unaudited consolidated | ||||||||||||
| statements of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 225,951 | $ | 219,906 | $ | 456,004 | $ | 434,941 | ||||
| LaRonde mine | 60,624 | 55,483 | 118,527 | 113,663 | ||||||||
| Lapa mine | 18,094 | 18,450 | 34,704 | 37,107 | ||||||||
| Kittila mine(i) | – | 23,515 | 27,182 | 49,545 | ||||||||
| Pinos Altos mine | 34,511 | 33,050 | 66,163 | 63,711 | ||||||||
| Creston Mascota deposit at Pinos Altos(ii) | 4,427 | 7,769 | 4,427 | 12,269 | ||||||||
| Meadowbank mine | 90,136 | 81,639 | 183,725 | 158,646 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 207,792 | $ | 219,906 | $ | 434,728 | $ | 434,941 | ||||
|
Reconciliation of Production Costs to Total Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold Produced by Mine |
||||||||||||
| LaRonde Mine – Total Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold Produced | ||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||
| (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||
| Production costs | $ | 60,624 | $ | 55,483 | $ | 118,527 | $ | 113,663 | ||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
|
Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges |
(12,663) | (23,334) | (42,219) | (70,852) | ||||||||
| Inventory and other adjustments(iii) | (4,696) | (42) | (4,434) | (757) | ||||||||
| Non-cash reclamation provision | (534) | (599) | (1,076) | (1,203) | ||||||||
| Cash operating costs | $ | 42,731 | $ | 31,508 | $ | 70,798 | $ | 40,851 | ||||
| Gold production (ounces) | 46,119 | 40,206 | 85,192 | 83,487 | ||||||||
| Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce)(iv) | $ | 927 | $ | 784 | $ | 831 | $ | 489 | ||||
| Lapa Mine – Total Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold Produced | ||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||
| (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||
| Production costs | $ | 18,094 | $ | 18,450 | $ | 34,704 | $ | 37,107 | ||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
|
Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges |
92 | 115 | 169 | 176 | ||||||||
| Inventory and other adjustments(iii) | (1,491) | (685) | 119 | (702) | ||||||||
| Non-cash reclamation provision | (17) | (15) | (34) | 221 | ||||||||
| Cash operating costs | $ | 16,678 | $ | 17,865 | $ | 34,958 | $ | 36,802 | ||||
| Gold production (ounces) | 23,178 | 28,157 | 50,046 | 56,656 | ||||||||
| Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce)(iv) | $ | 720 | $ | 634 | $ | 699 | $ | 650 | ||||
| Kittila Mine – Total Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold Produced(i) | ||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||
| (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||
| Production costs | $ | – | $ | 23,515 | $ | 27,182 | $ | 49,545 | ||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
|
Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges |
– | 134 | 157 | 253 | ||||||||
| Inventory and other adjustments(iii) | – | 446 | (294) | 886 | ||||||||
| Non-cash reclamation provision | – | (99) | (120) | (256) | ||||||||
| Cash operating costs | $ | – | $ | 23,996 | $ | 26,925 | $ | 50,428 | ||||
| Gold production (ounces) | – | 35,228 | 43,145 | 81,986 | ||||||||
| Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce)(iv) | $ | – | $ | 681 | $ | 624 | $ | 615 | ||||
| Pinos Altos Mine – Total Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold Produced | ||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||
| (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||
| Production costs | $ | 34,511 | $ | 33,050 | $ | 66,163 | $ | 63,711 | ||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
|
Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges |
(9,486) | (13,274) | (26,052) | (29,403) | ||||||||
| Inventory and other adjustments(iii) | (200) | (118) | (630) | 494 | ||||||||
| Non-cash reclamation provision | (74) | (52) | (148) | (103) | ||||||||
| Stripping costs(v) | (1,251) | (3,017) | (2,570) | (7,197) | ||||||||
| Cash operating costs | $ | 23,500 | $ | 16,589 | $ | 36,763 | $ | 27,502 | ||||
| Gold production (ounces) | 47,383 | 45,307 | 91,547 | 88,599 | ||||||||
| Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce)(iv) | $ | 496 | $ | 366 | $ | 402 | $ | 310 | ||||
|
Creston Mascota deposit at Pinos Altos – Total Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold Produced(ii) |
||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||
| (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||
| Production costs | $ | 4,427 | $ | 7,769 | $ | 4,427 | $ | 12,269 | ||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
|
Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges |
(136) | (476) | (136) | (796) | ||||||||
| Inventory and other adjustments(iii) | 1,127 | (1,031) | 1,127 | 111 | ||||||||
| Non-cash reclamation provision | (37) | (143) | (37) | (525) | ||||||||
| Stripping costs(v) | (332) | – | (332) | – | ||||||||
| Cash operating costs | $ | 5,049 | $ | 6,119 | $ | 5,049 | $ | 11,059 | ||||
| Gold production (ounces) | 10,147 | 18,049 | 10,147 | 31,773 | ||||||||
| Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce)(iv) | $ | 498 | $ | 339 | $ | 498 | $ | 348 | ||||
| Meadowbank Mine – Total Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold Produced | ||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||
| (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||
| Production costs | $ | 90,136 | $ | 81,639 | $ | 183,725 | $ | 158,646 | ||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
|
Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges |
(345) | (484) | (908) | (1,118) | ||||||||
| Inventory and other adjustments(iii) | 1,344 | (186) | 2,336 | 5,068 | ||||||||
| Non-cash reclamation provision | (387) | (395) | (780) | (789) | ||||||||
| Stripping costs(v) | (6,921) | (1,441) | (13,045) | (1,663) | ||||||||
| Cash operating costs | $ | 83,827 | $ | 79,133 | $ | 171,328 | $ | 160,144 | ||||
| Gold production (ounces) | 91,873 | 98,403 | 173,691 | 177,804 | ||||||||
| Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce)(iv) | $ | 912 | $ | 804 | $ | 986 | $ | 901 | ||||
| Reconciliation of Production Costs to Minesite Costs per Tonne by Mine | ||||||||||||
| LaRonde Mine – Minesite Costs per Tonne | ||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||
| (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||
| Production costs | $ | 60,624 | $ | 55,483 | $ | 118,527 | $ | 113,663 | ||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
| Inventory adjustment(vi) | (4,540) | 113 | (4,106) | (12) | ||||||||
| Non-cash reclamation provision | (534) | (599) | (1,076) | (1,203) | ||||||||
| Minesite operating costs | $ | 55,550 | $ | 54,997 | $ | 113,345 | $ | 112,448 | ||||
| Minesite operating costs (thousands of C$) | C$ | 57,334 | C$ | 55,524 | C$ | 115,754 | C$ | 113,254 | ||||
| Tonnes of ore milled (thousands of tonnes) | 559 | 573 | 1,153 | 1,218 | ||||||||
| Minesite costs per tonne (C$)(vii) | C$ | 103 | C$ | 97 | C$ | 100 | C$ | 93 | ||||
| Lapa Mine – Minesite Costs per Tonne | ||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||
| (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||
| Production costs | $ | 18,094 | $ | 18,450 | $ | 34,704 | $ | 37,107 | ||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
| Inventory adjustment(vi) | (1,434) | (635) | 237 | (615) | ||||||||
| Non-cash reclamation provision | (17) | (15) | (34) | 221 | ||||||||
| Minesite operating costs | $ | 16,643 | $ | 17,800 | $ | 34,907 | $ | 36,713 | ||||
| Minesite operating costs (thousands of C$) | C$ | 17,398 | C$ | 17,968 | C$ | 35,843 | C$ | 36,872 | ||||
| Tonnes of ore milled (thousands of tonnes) | 159 | 159 | 319 | 317 | ||||||||
| Minesite costs per tonne (C$)(vii) | C$ | 110 | C$ | 113 | C$ | 112 | C$ | 116 | ||||
| Kittila Mine – Minesite Costs per Tonne(i) | ||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||
| (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||
| Production costs | $ | – | $ | 23,515 | $ | 27,182 | $ | 49,545 | ||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
| Inventory adjustment(vi) | – | 451 | (294) | 891 | ||||||||
| Non-cash reclamation provision | – | (99) | (120) | (256) | ||||||||
| Minesite operating costs | $ | – | $ | 23,867 | $ | 26,768 | $ | 50,180 | ||||
| Minesite operating costs (thousands of €) | € | – | € | 18,729 | € | 20,580 | € | 38,187 | ||||
| Tonnes of ore milled (thousands of tonnes) | – | 251 | 267 | 540 | ||||||||
| Minesite costs per tonne (€)(vii) | € | – | € | 75 | € | 77 | € | 71 | ||||
| Pinos Altos Mine – Minesite Costs per Tonne | ||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||
| (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||
| Production costs | $ | 34,511 | $ | 33,050 | $ | 66,163 | $ | 63,711 | ||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
| Inventory adjustment(vi) | (103) | (77) | (506) | 535 | ||||||||
| Non-cash reclamation provision | (74) | (52) | (148) | (103) | ||||||||
| Stripping costs(v) | (1,251) | (3,017) | (2,570) | (7,197) | ||||||||
| Minesite operating costs | $ | 33,083 | $ | 29,904 | $ | 62,939 | $ | 56,946 | ||||
| Tonnes of ore processed (thousands of tonnes) | 665 | 735 | 1,391 | 1,457 | ||||||||
| Minesite costs per tonne (US$)(vii) | $ | 50 | $ | 41 | $ | 45 | $ | 39 | ||||
| Creston Mascota deposit at Pinos Altos – Minesite Costs per Tonne(ii) | ||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||
| (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||
| Production costs | $ | 4,427 | $ | 7,769 | $ | 4,427 | $ | 12,269 | ||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
| Inventory adjustment(vi) | 1,125 | (1,031) | 1,125 | 111 | ||||||||
| Non-cash reclamation provision | (37) | (143) | (37) | (525) | ||||||||
| Stripping costs(v) | (332) | – | (332) | – | ||||||||
| Minesite operating costs | $ | 5,183 | $ | 6,595 | $ | 5,183 | $ | 11,855 | ||||
| Tonnes of ore processed (thousands of tonnes) | 363 | 476 | 363 | 988 | ||||||||
| Minesite costs per tonne (US$)(vii) | $ | 14 | $ | 14 | $ | 14 | $ | 12 | ||||
| Meadowbank Mine – Minesite Costs per Tonne | ||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||
| (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted) | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2013 | June 30, 2012 | ||||||||
| Production costs | $ | 90,136 | $ | 81,639 | $ | 183,725 | $ | 158,646 | ||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||
| Inventory adjustment(vi) | 1,227 | 51 | 2,129 | 5,480 | ||||||||
| Non-cash reclamation provision | (387) | (395) | (780) | (789) | ||||||||
| Stripping costs(v) | (6,921) | (1,441) | (13,045) | (1,663) | ||||||||
| Minesite operating costs | $ | 84,055 | $ | 79,854 | $ | 172,029 | $ | 161,674 | ||||
| Minesite operating costs (thousands of C$) | C$ | 85,752 | C$ | 80,678 | C$ | 174,353 | C$ | 162,408 | ||||
| Tonnes of ore milled (thousands of tonnes) | 1,029 | 901 | 2,048 | 1,788 | ||||||||
| Minesite costs per tonne (C$)(vii) | C$ | 83 | C$ | 90 | C$ | 85 | C$ | 91 | ||||
| (i) |
Excludes the Kittila mine’s results for the second quarter of 2013. Due to scheduled maintenance, the Kittila mine only operated for 16 days during the second quarter of 2013. |
| (ii) |
Excludes results for the first quarter of 2013 due to the temporary suspension of active leaching at the Creston Mascota deposit at Pinos Altos between October 1, 2012 and March 13, 2013. |
| (iii) |
Under the Company’s revenue recognition policy, revenue is recognized on concentrates when legal title passes. As total cash costs per ounce of gold produced are calculated on a production basis, this inventory adjustment reflects the sales margin on the portion of concentrate production not yet recognized as revenue. |
| (iv) |
Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced is not a recognized measure under US GAAP and this data may not be comparable to data presented by other gold producers. This measure is calculated by adjusting production costs as recorded in the interim unaudited consolidated statements of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) for byproduct revenues, unsold concentrate inventory production costs, non-cash reclamation provisions, deferred stripping costs and other adjustments, and then dividing by the number of ounces of gold produced. The Company believes that this generally accepted industry measure is a realistic indication of operating performance and is a useful comparison point between periods. Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced is intended to provide investors with information about the cash generating capabilities of the Company’s mining operations. Management also uses this measure to monitor the performance of the Company’s mining operations. As market prices for gold are quoted on a per ounce basis, using this per ounce measure allows management to assess a mine’s cash generating capabilities at various gold prices. Management is aware that this per ounce measure of performance can be impacted by fluctuations in byproduct metal prices and exchange rates. Management compensates for these inherent limitations by using this measure in conjunction with minesite costs per tonne (discussed below) as well as other data prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Management also performs sensitivity analyses in order to quantify the effects of fluctuating metal prices and exchange rates. |
| (v) |
The Company reports total cash costs per ounce of gold produced and minesite costs per tonne using a common industry practice of deferring certain stripping costs that can be attributed to future production. The purpose of adjusting for these stripping costs is to enhance the comparability of total cash costs per ounce of gold produced and minesite costs per tonne to the Company’s peers within the mining industry. |
| (vi) |
This inventory adjustment reflects production costs associated with unsold concentrates. |
| (vii) |
Minesite costs per tonne is not a recognized measure under US GAAP and this data may not be comparable to data presented by other gold producers. This measure is calculated by adjusting production costs as shown in the interim unaudited consolidated statements of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) for unsold concentrate inventory production costs, non-cash reclamation provisions, deferred stripping costs and other adjustments, and then dividing by tonnes of ore milled. As the total cash costs per ounce of gold produced measure can be impacted by fluctuations in byproduct metal prices and exchange rates, management believes that the minesite costs per tonne measure provides additional information regarding the performance of mining operations, eliminating the impact of varying production levels. Management also uses this measure to determine the economic viability of mining blocks. As each mining block is evaluated based on the net realizable value of each tonne mined, in order to be economically viable the estimated revenue on a per tonne basis must be in excess of the minesite costs per tonne. Management is aware that this per tonne measure of performance can be impacted by fluctuations in processing levels and compensates for this inherent limitation by using this measure in conjunction with production costs prepared in accordance with US GAAP. |
Note Regarding Certain Measures of Performance
This press release presents financial performance measures, including
“total cash costs per ounce of gold produced”, “minesite costs per
tonne” and “all-in sustaining costs”, that are not recognized measures
under US GAAP. This data may not be comparable to data presented by
other gold producers. The Company believes that these generally
accepted industry measures are realistic indicators of operating
performance and useful in allowing year-over-year comparisons. However,
each of these non-US GAAP measures should be considered together with
other data prepared in accordance with US GAAP. These measures, taken
by themselves, are not necessarily indicative of operating costs or
cash flow measures prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Reconciliations
of the Company’s total cash costs per ounce of gold produced and
minesite costs per tonne financial performance measures to comparable
financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with US GAAP
are detailed above.
Forward-Looking Statements
The information in this news release has been prepared as at
2013
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and “forward looking
information” under the provisions of Canadian provincial securities
laws and are referred to herein as “forward-looking statements”. When
used in this document, words such as “anticipate”, “expect”,
“estimate”, “forecast”, “planned”, “possible”, “will”, “likely”,
“schedule” and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements.
Such statements include without limitation: the Company’s
forward-looking production guidance, including estimated ore grades,
project timelines, drilling results, orebody configurations, metal
production, life of mine estimates, production estimates, total cash
costs per ounce, minesite costs per tonne and all-in sustaining costs
estimates, cash flows, the estimated timing of scoping and other
studies, the methods by which ore will be extracted or processed,
expansion projects, recovery rates, mill throughput, and projected
exploration and capital expenditures, including costs and other
estimates upon which such projections are based; the Company’s ability
to fund its current pipeline of projects; the impact of maintenance
shutdowns; the Company’s goal to build a mine at Meliadine; the
Company’s ability to complete construction and bring into production
mines at Goldex or La India; and other statements and information
regarding anticipated trends with respect to the Company’s operations,
exploration and the funding thereof. Such statements reflect the
Company’s views as at the date of this news release and are subject to
certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Forward-looking
statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and
assumptions that, while considered reasonable by Agnico Eagle as of the
date of such statements, are inherently subject to significant
business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. The
factors and assumptions of Agnico Eagle contained in this news release,
which may prove to be incorrect include, but are not limited to the
assumptions set forth herein and in management’s discussion and
analysis and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year
ended
significant disruptions affecting operations, whether due to labour
disruptions, supply disruptions, damage to equipment, natural
occurrences, equipment failures, accidents, political changes, title
issues or otherwise; that permitting, production and expansion at each
of Agnico Eagle’s mines and growth projects proceeds on a basis
consistent with current expectations, and that Agnico Eagle does not
change its plans relating to such projects; that the exchange rate
between the Canadian dollar,
United States dollar will be approximately consistent with current
levels or as set out in this news release; that prices for gold,
silver, zinc, copper and lead will be consistent with Agnico Eagle’s
expectations; that prices for key mining and construction supplies,
including labour costs, remain consistent with Agnico Eagle’s current
expectations; that Agnico Eagle’s current estimates of mineral
reserves, mineral resources, mineral grades and metal recovery are
accurate; that there are no material delays in the timing for
completion of ongoing growth projects; that the Company’s current plans
to optimize production are successful; and that there are no material
variations in the current tax and regulatory environment. Many
factors, known and unknown, could cause the actual results to be
materially different from those expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. Such risks include, but are not limited to:
the volatility of prices of gold and other metals; uncertainty of
mineral reserves, mineral resources, mineral grades and metal recovery
estimates; uncertainty of future production, capital expenditures, and
other costs; currency fluctuations; financing of additional capital
requirements; cost of exploration and development programs; mining
risks; risks associated with foreign operations; governmental and
environmental regulation; the volatility of the Company’s stock price;
and risks associated with the Company’s byproduct metal derivative
strategies the assumptions set forth herein and in management’s
discussion and analysis and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended
there are no significant disruptions affecting operations, whether due
to labour disruptions, supply disruptions, damage to equipment, natural
occurrences, equipment failures, accidents, political changes, title
issues or otherwise; that permitting, production and expansion at each
of Agnico Eagle’s mines and growth projects proceeds on a basis
consistent with current expectations, and that Agnico Eagle does not
change its plans relating to such projects; that the exchange rate
between the Canadian dollar,
United States dollar will be approximately consistent with current
levels or as set out in this news release; that prices for gold,
silver, zinc, copper and lead will be consistent with Agnico Eagle’s
expectations; that prices for key mining and construction supplies,
including labour costs, remain consistent with Agnico Eagle’s current
expectations; that Agnico Eagle’s current estimates of mineral
reserves, mineral resources, mineral grades and metal recovery are
accurate; that there are no material delays in the timing for
completion of ongoing growth projects; that the Company’s current plans
to optimize production are successful; and that there are no material
variations in the current tax and regulatory environment. Many
factors, known and unknown, could cause the actual results to be
materially different from those expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. Such risks include, but are not limited to:
the volatility of prices of gold and other metals; uncertainty of
mineral reserves, mineral resources, mineral grades and metal recovery
estimates; uncertainty of future production, capital expenditures, and
other costs; currency fluctuations; financing of additional capital
requirements; cost of exploration and development programs; mining
risks; risks associated with foreign operations; governmental and
environmental regulation; the volatility of the Company’s stock price;
and risks associated with the Company’s byproduct metal derivative
strategies. For a more detailed discussion of such risks and other
factors, see the Form 20-F, as well as the Company’s other filings with
the Canadian Securities Administrators and the
Exchange Commission
not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements
and information, except as required by law. Accordingly, readers are
advised not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
Certain of the foregoing statements, primarily related to projects, are
based on preliminary views of the Company with respect to, among other
things, grade, tonnage, processing, recoveries, mining methods, capital
costs, total cash costs, minesite costs, and location of surface
infrastructure. Actual results and final decisions may be materially
different from those currently anticipated.
Scientific and Technical Information
The geological content of this press release has been prepared under the
supervision of, and reviewed by,
Vice-President, Exploration and a “Qualified Person” for the purposes
of NI 43-101.
Additional information about the Lapa mine that is required by NI
43-101, sections 3.2 and 3.3 and paragraphs 3.4 (a), (c) and (d) can be
found in the Technical Reports in respect of the Lapa mine filed on
Form 20-F.
_____________________________
1 Payable production of a mineral means the quantity of mineral produced
during a period contained in products that are sold by the Company
whether such products are shipped during the period or held as
inventory at the end of the period.
2 All-in sustaining cost is a non-GAAP measure. The Company calculates
all-in sustaining costs as the sum of total cash costs (net of
byproduct credits), sustaining capital expense, corporate, general and
administrative expense (net of stock option expense) and exploration
expense. The Company’s methodology for calculating all-in sustaining
costs may not be similar to methodology used by other gold producers
that disclose all-in sustaining cost. The Company may change the
methodology it uses to calculate all-in sustaining costs in the future,
including in circumstances where the
industry guidelines regarding this measure.
3 Minesite costs per tonne is a non-GAAP measure. For reconciliation to
production costs, see footnote (vii) to the “Reconciliation of
Production Costs to Total Cash Costs per Ounce and Minesite Costs per
Tonne” contained herein. See also “Note Regarding Certain Measures of
Performance”.
SOURCE
Investor Relations
(416) 947-1212