‘Blank-Check’ Companies Are Hot on Wall Street. Investors Can’t Ignore Them.

 

Note from Dudley Pierce Baker of CommonStockWarrants.com
Our interest in blank check companies is simple – every blank check company (SPAC) has a stock warrant trading with a 5 year life and the clock does not begin until an acquisition/merger is completed. There are currently 67 blank check companies currently trading and in my databases. Many potentially great opportunities.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Some big-name initial public offerings last year were panned for not having a profitable business. Yet more than a quarter of the offerings were of companies with no business at all—by design.

These were special purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs, also known as “blank-check companies.” Their goal is to raise money from public and private investors and then identify an acquisition target and buy it, typically within two years. SPACs raised $13.6 billion in 59 IPOs last year.

Should you be investing in one of these companies? The pitfalls can be numerous, and not all SPACs are created equal—but investors should not completely ignore this growing segment of the public markets.

Richard Branson’s spaceship company Virgin Galactic Holdings (SPCE), fantasy-sports website DraftKings, Twinkie-maker Hostess Brands (TWNK), and restaurant chain TGI Fridays are among companies to merge with SPACs in recent years. There are currently 71 SPACs on the market seeking targets, according to data from SPACInsider, a website devoted to research analysis and data about the industry. SPACs can designate a target industry or geographic region, or go public as generalists with no specific focus.

SPACs emerged in the early 1990s, and included terms highly favorable to their sponsors. Poor performances and unfamiliar participants gave these companies a bad rap.

They have come a long way since, says Chinh Chu, who founded CC Capital Partners in 2015 after leaving the Blackstone Group, where he had been one of the longest tenured partners at the firm.

“The current generation of SPACs includes better-quality companies, better management teams associated with them, and also better sponsorship—which all creates a virtuous cycle and attracts a different kind of investor in your SPACs,” he says.

Chu raised the then-largest ever SPAC in 2016, and is currently on his second— Collier Creek Holdings (ticker: CCH)—in partnership with former Kraft Foods CEO Roger Deromedi, to seek targets in the consumer goods industry.

Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, and Citigroup have all underwritten SPAC IPOs in recent years. TPG Capital, Apollo Global Management, Third Point, and Blackstone have each acted as SPAC sponsors.

“That’s also helped legitimize SPACs for sellers of assets, whereas before it was viewed as something you only did as a last resort for your company,” says Niron Stabinsky, who led the first big-bank underwriting of a SPAC while at Deutsche Bank in 2005. He is now head of SPACs at Credit Suisse. “What that’s meant is you’ve seen much better companies actually going public through SPACs,” he says.

SPAC sponsors have also been signing up top-quality managers like David Cote, who was CEO of Honeywell International from 2002 until 2017. Cote was on Barron’s list of top CEOs for five consecutive years.

You’ve seen much better companies actually going public through SPACs. 

—Niron Stabinsky, head of SPACs at Credit Suisse

“A friend reached out to me when I announced my retirement and said, ‘Dave you should consider a SPAC,’” Cote says. “I said ‘All right, well, what the heck is that.’ So I went to do some research and found myself becoming very intrigued with it. It looked to me like something that at one point had a tawdry reputation, but that there was a way to do it differently. And it was at that point that I was approached by [president and COO] John Waldron at Goldman Sachs, which was interested in sponsoring one.”

Goldman and Cote teamed up on GS Acquisition Holdings (GSAH), which raised $690 million in June 2018 to pursue an industrial acquisition. After considering more than 800 targets, they settled on one last month: Vertiv Holdings, a manufacturer of infrastructure for data centers including thermal and power management units. Spun off from Emerson Electric (EMR) in 2016, Vertiv has $4.3 billion in annual revenue and nearly 20,000 employees, and would become a public company through the transaction.

“I kind of view it as where Honeywell was after the first two or three years, where foundational work had been done and there was a lot more that we could do,” says Cote, who will become executive chairman of Vertiv if the deal is approved by shareholders in the coming weeks.

Not every SPAC partnership between a financial firm and a seasoned manager has worked. Alta Mesa Resources (AMRQQ), the largest SPAC by IPO proceeds (over $1 billion)—backed by former Anadarko Petroleum CEO Jim Hackett and Riverstone Holdings —filed for bankruptcy in September.

Still, the pairing of an established investment bank or private equity firm with an experienced executive who has proven operating skills is the best bet for investors looking to invest in a SPAC.

Goldman and Cote teamed up on GS Acquisition Holdings (GSAH), which raised $690 million in June 2018 to pursue an industrial acquisition. After considering more than 800 targets, they settled on one last month: Vertiv Holdings, a manufacturer of infrastructure for data centers including thermal and power management units. Spun off from Emerson Electric (EMR) in 2016, Vertiv has $4.3 billion in annual revenue and nearly 20,000 employees, and would become a public company through the transaction.

“I kind of view it as where Honeywell was after the first two or three years, where foundational work had been done and there was a lot more that we could do,” says Cote, who will become executive chairman of Vertiv if the deal is approved by shareholders in the coming weeks.

Not every SPAC partnership between a financial firm and a seasoned manager has worked. Alta Mesa Resources (AMRQQ), the largest SPAC by IPO proceeds (over $1 billion)—backed by former Anadarko Petroleum CEO Jim Hackett and Riverstone Holdings —filed for bankruptcy in September.

Still, the pairing of an established investment bank or private equity firm with an experienced executive who has proven operating skills is the best bet for investors looking to invest in a SPAC.

Goldman and Cote teamed up on GS Acquisition Holdings (GSAH), which raised $690 million in June 2018 to pursue an industrial acquisition. After considering more than 800 targets, they settled on one last month: Vertiv Holdings, a manufacturer of infrastructure for data centers including thermal and power management units. Spun off from Emerson Electric (EMR) in 2016, Vertiv has $4.3 billion in annual revenue and nearly 20,000 employees, and would become a public company through the transaction.

“I kind of view it as where Honeywell was after the first two or three years, where foundational work had been done and there was a lot more that we could do,” says Cote, who will become executive chairman of Vertiv if the deal is approved by shareholders in the coming weeks.

Not every SPAC partnership between a financial firm and a seasoned manager has worked. Alta Mesa Resources (AMRQQ), the largest SPAC by IPO proceeds (over $1 billion)—backed by former Anadarko Petroleum CEO Jim Hackett and Riverstone Holdings —filed for bankruptcy in September.

Still, the pairing of an established investment bank or private equity firm with an experienced executive who has proven operating skills is the best bet for investors looking to invest in a SPAC.

Goldman and Cote teamed up on GS Acquisition Holdings (GSAH), which raised $690 million in June 2018 to pursue an industrial acquisition. After considering more than 800 targets, they settled on one last month: Vertiv Holdings, a manufacturer of infrastructure for data centers including thermal and power management units. Spun off from Emerson Electric (EMR) in 2016, Vertiv has $4.3 billion in annual revenue and nearly 20,000 employees, and would become a public company through the transaction.

“I kind of view it as where Honeywell was after the first two or three years, where foundational work had been done and there was a lot more that we could do,” says Cote, who will become executive chairman of Vertiv if the deal is approved by shareholders in the coming weeks.

Not every SPAC partnership between a financial firm and a seasoned manager has worked. Alta Mesa Resources (AMRQQ), the largest SPAC by IPO proceeds (over $1 billion)—backed by former Anadarko Petroleum CEO Jim Hackett and Riverstone Holdings —filed for bankruptcy in September.

Still, the pairing of an established investment bank or private equity firm with an experienced executive who has proven operating skills is the best bet for investors looking to invest in a SPAC.

Goldman and Cote teamed up on GS Acquisition Holdings (GSAH), which raised $690 million in June 2018 to pursue an industrial acquisition. After considering more than 800 targets, they settled on one last month: Vertiv Holdings, a manufacturer of infrastructure for data centers including thermal and power management units. Spun off from Emerson Electric (EMR) in 2016, Vertiv has $4.3 billion in annual revenue and nearly 20,000 employees, and would become a public company through the transaction.

“I kind of view it as where Honeywell was after the first two or three years, where foundational work had been done and there was a lot more that we could do,” says Cote, who will become executive chairman of Vertiv if the deal is approved by shareholders in the coming weeks.

Not every SPAC partnership between a financial firm and a seasoned manager has worked. Alta Mesa Resources (AMRQQ), the largest SPAC by IPO proceeds (over $1 billion)—backed by former Anadarko Petroleum CEO Jim Hackett and Riverstone Holdings —filed for bankruptcy in September.

Still, the pairing of an established investment bank or private equity firm with an experienced executive who has proven operating skills is the best bet for investors looking to invest in a SPAC.

Wall Street’s New Darling

Issuance of SPACS has boomed as bigger financial players get involved.

*Includes overallotment proceeds

Source: SPACInsider

By convention, a SPAC will go public at $10 per unit, which consists of a common share and a fraction of a warrant—as low as one quarter—generally exercisable at $11.50. Once the securities begin trading, the units split and the stock and warrants can be bought and sold separately.

The cash raised in a SPAC IPO goes into a trust, where it earns interest until the merger with the target company is completed. At the time of the transaction, common stock can also be redeemed for a proportionate share of the cash in a SPAC’s trust.

“That means that an investor who sees the deal and doesn’t like it can ask for their money back,” says Douglas Ellenoff, a partner at the law firm Ellenoff Grossman & Schole, which has advised more than 65 SPACs since 2017. “But they’ll almost always still vote in favor of the deal because it hurts their warrants if it fails.”

And redemptions can be significant—nearly 100% in some cases.

The redemption option means that SPACs can be left without enough cash to complete approved deals. Many need to rely on committed funding from their sponsors or new institutional investors when the deal closes. In a private investment in public equity, or PIPE, deal, backers will receive a new allocation of shares, warrants, or both—potentially diluting existing shareholders. Some SPACs have also raised debt coinciding with their merger.

It is another sign for investors to watch. If new shareholders in a PIPE deal are coming in at $7 a share, existing shareholders get diluted and the stock will tend to trade down to that price after the transaction closes and the option to redeem has passed.

Alternatively, a PIPE deal at or very close to $10 a share can be a positive sign for a SPAC’s long-term prospects after the transaction—at least in the minds of the investors willing to put in a significant amount of new money at that level, assuming the company is worth more.

If a SPAC can’t consummate a merger within its specified term, its trust is liquidated and returned to stockholders, while warrants expire worthless. That gives sponsors an incentive to get a deal done – but also means investors should be warier of transactions announced right before the deadline, when the pressure to find one is highest.

Selected SPACs

The attributes of special purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs, can vary widely; no two are alike.

Sources: SPACInsider; FactSet; company reports

After the SPAC has identified its target company, “the decision on whether to hold the stock or warrant really boils down to fundamental analysis,” says Erik Falk, head of strategy at Magnetar Capital. “You have to think of the target company like any other stock investment and do your homework to understand its probability of providing a return on your investment.” Magnetar has about $13 billion in assets under management, which includes SPAC shares and warrants.

Of recent SPACs, one to keep an eye on is Mosaic Acquisition (MOSC), which raised $345 million in a 2017 IPO and struck a deal to acquire Vivint Smart Home from its majority owner Blackstone last fall. Vivint bills itself as “smart home as a service,” with 95% of its revenue recurring. Its 1.6 million subscribers pay an average of $63 a month for smart-home devices and services including smart locks, cameras, thermostats, and security monitoring. “Smart-home adoption is in the very, very early stages at this point,” says Vivint CEO Todd Pederson, who founded the business in 1999.

Mosaic is sponsored by Fortress Investment Group and David Maura, who assembled a collection of consumer brands into Spectrum Brands Holdings (SPB).

Vivint had $848 million in revenue for the first nine months of 2019, up 10% from the same period a year earlier, while earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or Ebitda, rose 19%, to $474 million. Vivint expects to maintain 14% top line growth and 23% Ebitda growth through 2021 as it signs up new users and sells existing ones on new products and services.

The deal terms look attractive. At an enterprise value of about $4.2 billion, Vivint will go public at less than eight times its estimated 2020 adjusted Ebitda. Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) trades for over 20 times EV/Ebitda, and is less profitable.

As with many private equity-backed companies, Vivint’s debt load is high—but deal proceeds will be entirely used to reduce it. And Vivint and Mosaic’s backers are in for the long term. Blackstone is rolling over its entire ownership of Vivint into the newly public company, and is putting in an additional $100 million in cash at a price of $10 per share. All PIPE commitments from Blackstone, Fortress, and others total $475 million.

Shareholders approved the deal on Friday. Shares will begin trading on the New York Stock Exchange (ticker: VVNT) on Tuesday.

There are more conservative ways to play in SPACs. Because the common shares will be redeemable for their share of the cash in the SPAC’s trust, a nearly risk-free arbitrage opportunity exists.

“We view SPACs in a similar way that we view closed-end funds,” says Chris Raby, a portfolio manager at Karpus Investment Management. “It is a vehicle that can trade at a discount to its intrinsic value. We primarily buy SPACs after they’ve split, and we just buy the common shares when they’re trading at a discount to the cash in trust.”

Karpus, based in Pittsford, N.Y., with $3.6 billion in assets under management, uses SPACs to offset some of its longer-duration strategies. By getting in below the guaranteed value it can redeem its shares for, investors can lock in a minimum—although modest—return, with the potential for greater gains if the stock trades up.

“Instead of just being in T-bills, this gives us the opportunity to earn a higher yield,” Raby says. “From our perspective, these investments can earn a conservative return with the potential for upside if one of the deals is well-received by the market.”

We view SPACs in a similar way that we view closed-end funds. 

—Chris Raby, Karpus Investment Management

Spartan Energy Acquisition (SPAQ) could present such an opportunity. Sponsored by private equity firm Apollo Global Management, Spartan raised $552 million in an August 2018 IPO to seek targets in the North American energy industry. Shares recently traded for $10.19, a 1.4% discount to their estimated $10.31 at their liquidation date this coming August, according to SPACInsider.

Should investors hold for about seven months through that deadline and redeem for cash, they can receive a risk-free annualized 2.36% yield. A U.S. six-month Treasury bill yields 1.57%. And if Spartan finds an attractive target before its deadline and the common shares trade higher than $10.31, investors can pocket those gains instead.

As with any new area of the markets, investors should approach with caution, and go with the best track records. But as the SPAC industry matures, the opportunities will continue to grow. •

Write to Nicholas Jasinski at nicholas.jasinski@barrons.com

About The Author

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top